Congress Says We’ll Get A Second Stimulus Check — But It’s Only $600

Photo: Samuel Corum/Getty Images.
Where have we heard this one before? Congress claims it's close to passing another COVID-19 stimulus package, which will include a direct stimulus payment to most Americans. The CARES Act — the only stimulus bill to date that contained a direct payment — was signed in late March, and since then lawmakers have been unable to pass another bipartisan bill. But this time, apparently, they mean it.
Top Republican and Democrat negotiators are now close to agreeing on a relief package that would give roughly $900 billion in aid. That's less than the $2.2 trillion Democrats were aiming for, but more than the $500 billion "skinny stimulus" that Republicans attempted to pass in the fall.
With the package being under $1 trillion, it does not include aid for state and local governments, which have been struggling with funding throughout the pandemic — and the stimulus check would not be another $1,200, but about half that, which means that struggling Americans will have received less than $2,000 in aid this year, as they continue to have little to no income and food banks around the country experience unprecedented need. The package will probably provide enhanced unemployment benefits for the first four months of 2021, but it won't be the $600/week boost that unemployed Americans were eligible to receive through July of this year. It's more likely that it'll be an extra $300/week.
The current package also does not contain a controversial liability shield that would have made it harder to hold businesses responsible for COVID-19-related negligence, which Republicans considered crucial to the next stimulus.
Will this finally be the deal that passes both the House and Senate? We would hope so, despite the fact that it doesn't provide enough aid. But after being yanked around for so many months, it's hard not to feel cynical. As one former U.S. president said, fool me once — shame on you. But you can't get fooled again. Whatever the outcome, it’s clear that Americans won’t be getting the more generous, more comprehensive relief they need.
This story was originally published on July 21st, 2020.
In late July, House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy admitted that the next COVID-19 stimulus bill probably won’t pass until August. While the news that Congress is putting together another relief package is a welcome one, Americans have been waiting for a second direct stimulus payment for months now — the CARES Act was passed in late March. On top of another direct stimulus, the next package is also likely to include extra provisions for federal unemployment benefits. But with no renewal likely before August, it means the extra $600 given on top of state unemployment benefits will expire after this week.
McCarthy has said that he expects a bill to pass “probably in the first week of August.” But if Republicans and Democrats don’t come to an agreement by the first week of August, there won’t be a bill until September — after August 7th, Congress is in recess until September 7th. Yesterday, it returned from a recess that lasted from July 3rd to July 17th.
Will the extra $600 unemployment be extended?
Republican lawmakers have continued to say that the extra unemployment money disincentivizes people from working, encouraging them to stay at home and do nothing. “We don’t think any federal money should be spent that gives you a disincentive to work,” said McCarthy at the White House yesterday.
Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin expressed similar sentiments, saying that he would “make sure that we don’t pay people more money to stay home than go to work.” He has said that if the next bill extends unemployment benefits, it will limit the replacement rate to not exceed 100% of past wages. Other lawmakers have suggested it could be reduced to $200 to $400 a week.
The disproportionate worry over disincentivizing work ignores that the extra $600 was intended exactly to encourage people to stay home during a pandemic that has so far killed over 140,000 Americans. Allowing the $600 benefit to expire, some argue, could disincentivize people from choosing their lives over a paycheck. The extra money was also included because state unemployment benefits have typically been ungenerous, replacing less than 50% of usual pay. It has been especially helpful to the many Americans who make low wages, in a nation where the federal minimum wage is only $7.25.
Many experts believe that allowing the $600 to expire would be devastating, setting off a wave of evictions and homelessness, especially as it coincides with the expiration of a federal eviction moratorium. Even Jerome Powell, chairman of the Federal Reserve, has encouraged Congress to extend the extra unemployment money. The Century Foundation has estimated that over 25 million people are currently receiving the $600; new weekly unemployment claims have stayed high as many populous states experience a huge rise in confirmed COVID-19 cases. 
Will there be another stimulus payment?
Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell announced today that the next bill will include a second direct stimulus payment. But it’s not clear if Congress will send another $1,200 with the same eligibility rules. The CARES Act sent $1,200 to individuals making $75,000 and under, phasing out the payment completely at an income of $99,000, but in recent weeks McConnell has suggested that there may be an income cap at $40,000 this time. White House economic adviser Larry Kudlow said earlier this month that the next stimulus payment may not only be limited to Americans with lower incomes and those who have lost a job, but that it could also be less than $1,200.
The HEROES Act, which passed the House in mid-May, included not just another $1,200 to individuals but closed the loophole that shut some college students out of the first stimulus, as well as increasing the amount paid per dependent from $500 to $1,200. It has not been taken up in the Senate.
Other relief ideas
There are other measures being floated for the next stimulus bill, including additional Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) funding for small businesses impacted by COVID-19, according to McConnell. The Washington Post has also reported that the bill will provide about $70 billion for schools, but that this funding would be tied to schools reopening. In early July, President Trump threatened to take away federal funding for schools that didn’t reopen. Teachers across the nation, especially in states currently being overwhelmed by new cases, have expressed serious concern over going back to school. In Florida, teachers have filed a lawsuit against a state mandate requiring reopen schools next month.
Trump has also continued to call for a payroll tax cut to be implemented in the next stimulus bill, despite bipartisan disapproval of it. A payroll tax cut would only help people who currently have a job, increasing their paychecks a little, while harming Social Security programs.
According to the Washington Post, the White House is reportedly seeking to block additional funding for coronavirus testing and contact tracing, as well as money for the CDC, in the next stimulus bill. Senate Republicans, on the other hand, allegedly want to give an extra $25 billion to states so they can continue ramping up testing and contact tracing. In some states, people are waiting over a week to receive their COVID-19 test results. Last week, the Trump administration suddenly ordered hospitals to stop reporting COVID-19 information to the CDC and to instead send it directly to the Department of Health and Human Services, causing worries over data transparency in the face of a White House that has consistently lied about or downplayed the number of new cases.

More from Work & Money

R29 Original Series